Men occasionally
stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry
off as if nothing had happened. - Sir
Winston Churchill (1874 - 1965)
|
I know that most
men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity,
can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be
such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which
they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have
proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread,
into the fabric of their lives. - Leo Tolstoy (1828
– 1910)
|
Your letter is superb. Your
connecting it to relevant authorities in explanation and in sending it
to them to incite some public responsibility is equally masterful.
Thank you doing this on all our behalves.
John McMurtry
Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada University of Guelph Professor Emeritus UN author & editor of Philosophy and World Problems |
Your research is sound...We definitely need to begin holding our
elected representatives in Canada to account on this, and your
letter is one way to start that...I want to say that I love the
way you've used UNSC 1368. I've often quoted it in presentations,
but I simply argue that it provided no justification for the
invasion of Afghanistan: as you correctly argue, what it actually
does is obligate governments to seek the true perpetrators of the
9/11 crimes...Maybe there is a way the Canadian 9/11 truth
movement, which is pretty scattered at the moment, can unite
around a couple of main items, such as your letter, in the
not-too-distant future...Thanks for the very eloquent letter.
Graeme MacQueen
PhD, Harvard Associate Professor, McMaster University Founder of McMaster University Centre for Peace Studies Co-director of Media & Peace Education in Afghanistan |
I want to attempt to express the enormity of my respect for you...
Your letter is up there as a work of great political literature,
in a league with the Declaration of Independence, Letter From The
Birmingham Jail, etc.
Andrea |
Amazing letter, just read it, incredible work keeping track of all the
recipients, and the many non-responses. You're a real patriot. Some of the
recipients really picked on the wrong fellow to try and pretend they didn't
receive the letter.
Larry
Democracy Now! UVic Radio, an Independent News Hour |
I've been researching this subject for years now and have recently come
across your letter to Toews. For what it's worth I think you've nailed
it; absolutely outstanding, one of the best I've seen to date if not the
best. I've passed along many articles on this subject and have sent
copies of your letter to contacts already. In my humble opinion it is
the most well written letter/article I've seen on any subject. Keep up
the good work! If there were more like you in the battle we'd already
have reached the tipping point. The masses are stirring and I have
little doubt the perpetrators are running scared. Things sure are
getting "interesting", justice shall prevail.
Jim
Royal Canadian Navy 1981-2001 |
I agree with this thought provoking thesis and believe that
further investigation into the 9/11 event will take place because
of it.
Peter
Retired Canadian Infantry Officer Platoon Commander Military Historian |
It is very well written. You are a gifted writer...Glad to have
you with us...It is a great letter and one that should shine
above many on the subject.
Christopher Porter
Canadian Action Party Leader |
I just wanted to say that its one of the best letters on 9/11,
integrating in the appropriate issues and historical perspective,
that I have ever read.
John
Professional Engineer |
I have never seen a better written letter! Very well done!
Joseph
Medical Oncologist Clinical Professor Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia |
This letter has truly opened my eyes. My respect for your
commitment to discovering the truth and the passion underlying
this exceptionally high quality letter is substantial.
Anna
Law Student University of Durham |
This is an amazing piece of work, and research behind it.
Steve
Retired high school science teacher |
This is an amazing work, thanks for using your energy to do
and say the things some of us are not able, in such a
courageous and concise way. I pray this letter will not fall
on deaf ears, I truly pray.
Rachelle |
You are right on! And you are very brave...I fear that
democracy in Canada is a mere charade, if it ever truly
existed. We need to continue the efforts and I applaud you.
Thanks again for your thoughtful letter.
Ellen
Librarian |
Congratulations. Your letter is excellent. The issue that you
raise is one that I am very familiar with, and while the
implications are unfortunate and frightening, I tend to agree
with your views. I have encountered everything that you mention
in your letter, however it was impressive to see it gathered
so cogently, and with such immediacy.
Joe
Undergraduate Student University of British Columbia |
This is one of the most well put together compilation I have
ever seen on this topic.
Mike
Professional Musician |
Very well written ... with lots of references...You make some
great points, and it sounds like there are a lot of other
people, with excellent credentials, who also want answers...
But, you've done your research well, and wrote a good letter.
Ed
Computer Science Instructor University of British Columbia |
This is an amazing piece of work, and research behind it.
Steve
Retired Highschool Teacher |
This is indeed an amazing work, and I support your efforts fully.
Nathan |
Your letter is brilliant.
Gery
Professional Engineer |
That letter you did was really something. Thanks.
Bill |
What an amazing letter! The world needs more citizens like you
who are critical thinkers, objective researchers, intelligent
observers, with the strength of character to stand up for what
they believe it. Your letter is an act of moral courage, and I
would hope that in the Canadian, and global context, we have
room for those who take action against evil. It reminds me of
a quote from Ayn Rand: 'The evil of the world is made possible
by nothing but the sanction you give it.' Thank-you for not
sanctioning it!
Jackie |
Your letter to Vic Toews is outstanding, a most remarkable
piece or research and composition.
Raymond |
I've read your letter and it looks to be extremely well
researched and documented.
Blair
Retired Canadian Infantry Officer Plantoon Commander |
Incredibly well written, Kip. Thanks for writing that on behalf
of all of us. I hope it falls on open ears, for once.
Michael
Software Engineer |
It's very, very well written and I hope justice of the highest
order will be achieved for all.
Lisa |
Wow that was an impressive letter.
Ron |
Well done....very well done.
Amy |
Kip this is very impressive; very well-written and researched...
The truth shall prevail!
Aleya |
An informed and informative letter.
Samad |
You are a wonderful writer...with a great message...I will
forward the letter to friends.
Linda
Elementary School Teacher |
Good letter. Too bad Ottawa seems stone deaf to everything not
uttered by the 46 richest Canadians (worth as much as the
14,000,000 poorest) and/or the American plutocrats who tell
them what to do.
Mark
Film Studies Instructor University of British Columbia |
I thought your letter was excellent. It actually blew me away
how precise all of your details were.
Danielle
Elementary School Teacher |
I read your letter. It is 100% correct in my view.
David
Software Engineer Retired Canadian Artilleryman |
Got it from the Canadian Action party website - let's give
these people hell on earth, like they want to do to us!
Jim |
A big applause and thank you for a very well crafted and
referenced letter to Vic Toews on the matter of 911 truth...
Last fall my eyes finally opened on the subject and it is good
to see that people like you are taking action. I am also
encourage that an existing Canadian federal party has actually
taking on this difficult subject and is trying to get to the
root of the problem.
DeVries |
I read the letter you sent to Vic Toews...The content of your
letter is bang on.
Victor |
I read your letter - very well done. I like your low key
strategy. Let people read the letter, and the (non)responses,
and let them make up their own minds.
Dan
Law Student University of British Columbia |
As someone who has spent many years perfecting my own writing
skill I must congratulate you on this work, which is both well
written and well argued. I wasn't familiar with the all the
facts regarding traces of explosive material found in the WTC
rubble, and while it's still somewhat challenging for me to wrap
my head around the letter's main argument, I must say that my
opinion on this issue has certainly been influenced your research.
Ilia
Economics Undergraduate Student University of British Columbia |
All I can say is wow, what an amazing letter. Keep up the good work.
Marc |
I felt compelled to write to you after [...] told me all about you and
sent me to your website where I was BLOWN AWAY by your concise, eloquent
and magnificent letter to Vic Toews concerning 9/11. I must commend you
on your courage and dedication.
Trevor
Professional Animator |
Who |
Received |
Resolution |
Comments |
|
|
|
|
Adrienne Clarkson (Former Governor General) | Unknown | N/A | |
|
|
|
|
Arthur Eggleton (Senator and Former Minister of National Defence) | Unknown | N/A | |
|
|
|
|
Bill Vander Zalm (28th Premier of British Columbia from 1986 to 1991) | Yes | Read, responded |
"I was very impressed with
your presentation and your way of presenting but most of all I was
impressed with your broad knowledge of so many things happening...Your
letter is extremely well
written and documented." Mr Vander Zalm and I met in private at his home after he had read the letter. I then provided him with an additional briefing and answered any questions he had. Mr Vander Zalm's knowledge of both this matter and those tangential was remarkable and extensive. |
|
|
|
|
Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) | Yes | Read, responded |
"I found [your letter to the government] on the internet...It's very well written...It's pretty interesting and obviously the kind of stuff we're interested in...For stuff like this, this is exactly for us...Thank you very much and I will look into it...I'll make sure it gets to who it needs to," (Christina). |
Commonwealth Secretariat | Yes | Read, no response |
Prompted with his co-hosting of a conference for the heads of various anti-corruption agencies in Africa held in May of 2012 in Livingstone, Zambia, I brought the document to his attention. This was confirmed via an access attempt and download of the letter from 62.164.212.19 on 17 Jan 2013. Someone from his office re-visited this site again on 29 Jan 2013, then again on 8 Feb 2013. This IP address falls within the Commonwealth Secretariat subnet. |
|
|
|
|
David Johnson (Governor General) | Yes | Read, responded |
"I regret that the Governor
General cannot intervene in matters that are the responsibility of
public or elected officials."
The British North America Act of 1867 vests executive power in Her Majesty the Queen of Canada who is represented in person by the Governor General of Canada, His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnson. He may be perceived as ceremonial, but in actuality, his legal mandate bestows him with the highest domestic public office the nation has to offer, exceeding even that of the Prime Minister's Office. This is why the Prime Minister must secure the Governor General's permission in the dissolution of Parliament or in the deployment of military force abroad. Holders of the Office cannot limit themselves merely to its privledges, but none of its responsibilities. Nevertheless, this matter of grave concern remained an unregistered interest. Televised spectator games featuring acts of violence that merely affect the lives of a handful of people at a given time warranted commentary while a probable violation of section 46 of the Criminal Code (High Treason) and the incumbent necessity of the dissolution of Parliament, the initiation of a public enquiry with powers of subpoena, and the holding of a Federal election prompted none. |
|
|
|
|
Enza Uda (Associate Producer, CBC News, Go Public) | Yes | Read, responded |
"I've read your essay — which
is well-written and well-researched. However, we are not the
forum to air your paper," (Enza Uda). Enza's mandate is to hold powers that be accountable. She has worked before to uncover a war criminal who is now an old man, incapable of defending himself, and whose government was dissolved more than half a century ago. She refused to forward the document to an appropriate forum on the grounds that it was not of interest to the CBC. Listen here. |
|
|
|
|
Hardy Staub (Liberal MP candidate for South Surrey - White Rock - Cloverdale) | Yes | Read, responded |
"Thank you for your document that I read with interest...I noticed that you had sent it to a variety of very important people and at this stage those are the people I would have sent it to as well...Once elected however I could forward it to the appropriate members of our new government," (Hardy Staub). |
|
|
|
|
Jasbir Sandhu (Member of Parliament for Surrey North, NDP, Official Opposition Critic for Public Safety) | Yes | Read, responded |
The letter was read in its
entirety before him privately in his constituency office where I found him to be both very reasonable and receptive. He acknowledged that he was already suspicious of the collapse of the north and south towers, but was not aware of the third building to collapse in NYC until the briefing. He found the information quite reasonable, given that, as he noted, "there were no WMDs in Iraq".
He requested several weeks to examine the letter in greater detail and review the additional material he was provided with. He will provide his party's official response to the five points made in the conclusion of my letter when Parliament reconvenes in September 2011. Given that Mr Sandhu is the official opposition critic for the Public Safety portfolio, the intended recipient of my letter, and given that he is in good rapport with the Minister responsible for that cabinet position, the information he is now in possession with left me thinking that it was in appropriate hands. Several weeks passed, giving Mr Sandhu ample time to review the material. In a followup meeting, he claimed he had not had time to review the material, had not liaised with the Minister, and was still preoccupied with other things of "higher priority" - among them, by his own admission, a review of a bill to extend the Anti-Terrorism Act. In the end, he refused to sign the petition demanding a new investigation, although his clerk signed it on the spot, while he requested an indeterminate amount of time to reflect on the matter. He did, however, concede that personal safety was an issue in his decision at that point. |
|
|
|
|
Kathy Tomlinson (Journalist, CBC News, Go Public) | Yes | No response | Did not express interest after receiving letter. Listen here. "We hold the powers that be accountable," (CBC Go Public website). |
|
|
|
|
Macleans | Yes | Deleted without reading | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
|
|
|
|
Mark Warawa (Conservative Member of Parliament for Langley, BC) | Yes | Read, responded |
8 Dec 2012, I attended the screening of a film on gendercide in Vancouver. Mr Warawa was present. I approached him after the film and requested a meeting to discuss a separate social justice and human rights issue. He was agreeable and indicated I liaise with his assistant Annette to select an appropriate date. 17 Jan 2013, I briefed Mr Warawa at his constituency office at 104-4769 222 St, Langley, BC, where he was provided with a copy of my letter to the Minister of Public Safety, shown video footage of the collapse of WTC 7, and given a documentary DVD film. He reassured me that he would examine the material I provided him as time would permit, in addition to the Toronto Report I would drop off later when I was resupplied with new copies. While viewing the collapse of WTC 7, Mr Warawa noted that "the collapse of the third building...It doesn't look great...no". He was reassured that he need not endorse our petition for a new and independent investigation into the events of 9/11, but only that we encourage him to deliver it on behalf of any of the signatories within his riding. After I left, he spent some time later that afternoon examining my personal website. The following morning he returned to this page and spent approximately 64 seconds examining the other responses to date prior to downloading an additional copy of the letter. Earlier that day, during our meeting he had said he would likely read it over his flight back to Ottawa that weekend. That evening, he sent me a response in followup to my email which thanked him for generously providing me with his time that afternoon. "Hi Kip, thank you for this follow-up email. It was a pleasure meeting you yesterday. I will be in touch. Regards, Mark Warawa, Member of Parliament for Langley". Five days later, as I had promised him during his briefing, I dropped off two copies of the Toronto Report, one for Mr Warawa and another for his assistant. 14 May 2013, I received a response from Mr Warawa. "I have had a chance to skim through the text that you offered and I have decided not to pursue this matter further; therefore, I will not be presenting the petitions. I encourage you to contact your MP or another MP who may be interested in presenting these." I did not attempt to disuade him otherwise, but did attempt to determine at the very least whether the decision had been his. I did not receive a response after several attempts to make contact. 10 July 2013, I managed to liaise with Mr Warawa's assistant at his constituency office over the telephone in an effort to document who had made the decision to not deliver the petition, Mr Warawa, or someone else. The assistant declined to provide that information, but said that the issue was not sufficiently important to Mr Warawa, that I was not a member of his riding (which I had disclosed from the beginning), and suggested that I had deliberately mislead Mr Warawa. Audio available here. |
Mark Kelley (CBC The National / News: Morning) | Yes | Read, responded |
"Hi Kip...This is an extraordinary piece of work," he remarked in May of
2011, though leaving the question of responsibility hanging.
Over the course of about nine months, I found it interesting that the CBC found some things newsworthy and other things not. Mark was repeatedly approached gently with the request that he go on the air, as he does so regularly, and clarify the matter by simply stating the truth. Excuses were presented from time constraints to a lack of interest. In January of 2012, my tone escalated to highlight the gravity of the situation and the necessity that, as a journalist, he inform the public. His response and my followup can be found here. |
|
|
|
|
Mary Dawson (Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner) | Yes | Responded | "I wish to confirm that I was able to open and print your letter addressed to Minister Toews. I have passed on your request to our investigation division for their review and our office will contact you with a response as soon as possible," (Jocelyne Brisebois, Communications Officer for the Parliamentary Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner). |
|
|
|
|
Niels Harrit (Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen) | Yes | Read, responded |
"This is brilliant writing,
clever and comprehensive. Terrific, solid work, well documented,
learned a lot myself. Just to quote UNSC 1368 should be enough for all
of us," (Niels Harrit). Professor Harrit was among the original whistleblowers to expose the discovery of nano-thermite uncovered in the dust of the WTC ruins. |
|
|
|
|
Office of the Prosecutor International Criminal Court | Yes | Read, responded | Inquired a total of forty-one times before receipt was finally acknowledged, though I was advised that a receipt "does not mean that an investigation will be conducted". It was downloaded at least 12 times from an address on their subnet (213.208.214.206), according to the Apache access logs. |
|
|
|
|
Patricia Graham (Editor-in-chief, Vancouver Sun) | Yes | Deleted without reading | Patricia was apprised of the false flag issue by my father's presentation at the Vancouver Club August, 2010 as were the many other high profile individuals present, such as an ex US diplomat, supreme court judge, and several prominent CEOs. All now are aware of the evidence and that Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth are asking for a new independent investigation. Patricia, for reasons unknown, so far has failed to report on the matter. |
|
|
|
|
Paul Hellyer (Former Minister of National Defence and Former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada) | Yes | Read, responded |
"I have managed to carefully
read the letter to Minister Toews and to scan the attached document
concerning thermitic material. I must congratulate you on the very
comprehensive manner in which you have assembled the information
contained in your letter. It is most impressive. (...) All I can do is
to thank you for the exhaustive work that you have undertaken and to
hope – which I know is a very long hope – that the minister or one of
his colleagues will take it seriously and commission the required
analysis. (...) "In my mind you are demonstrating the qualities of integrity, loyalty, courage, honesty, fairness and responsibility putting service to humanity before self-interest which is something that should be expected of all of us, but I know quite a few people who wouldn’t see it that way," (Paul Hellyer). |
|
|
|
|
Peace Arch News | Yes | Read, responded |
Published with much gratitude to Lance Peverly, editor, for his courage in demonstrating real journalism in prioritizing the needs of an informed community before career. |
|
|
|
|
RCMP, White Rock Detachment | Yes | Read, responded |
"I went through your material
last night and you've done everything you can. You've gone to the right
agencies and something like that is way out of my purview and
jurisdiction. (...) As far as we're concerned here in White Rock, it's
where it's supposed to be. I don't have the resources to deal with
anything like that here," (Sgt Roland Pierschke).
The officer agreed with the thesis of the letter and conceded that he had known since "day one". The RCMP's unofficial motto is "we always get our man". |
|
|
|
|
RCMP National Security Information Network | Yes | Read, responded |
RCMP National Security Investigator currently investigating and considered the letter to be "legitimate". It claims to have "a mandate to collect information from the general public regarding terrorist activity," (NSIN website). |
|
|
|
|
Russ Hiebert (Member of Parliament for South Surrey - White Rock - Cloverdale, Conservative) | Yes | Read, responded |
The letter was read in its
entirety before him privately at his constituency office. He found it
"very interesting" and requested an electronic copy of the letter to
verify footnotes, along with some time to digest the material presented
to him. He later responded in writing where he acknowledged that the official government explanation for the collapse of WTC7 was not an explanation. |
|
|
|
|
Senate Committee on Conflict of Interest for Senators | Unknown | N/A | |
|
|
|
|
Senate Committee on National Security & Defence | Unknown | N/A | |
|
|
|
|
Sheila Fraser (Auditor General) | Yes | No response | |
|
|
|
|
Special Senate Committee on Anti-terrorism | Yes | Read, responded |
Barbara Reynolds, Committee Clerk, confirmed receipt. She has been notified that I am available to testify before the Senate, if they wish. |
|
|
|
|
Stewart Bell (Journalist, The National Post) | Yes | Read, no response |
Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
|
|
|
|
The Guardian | Yes | Read, no response |
Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
|
|
|
|
The Leader-Post | Yes | Deleted without reading | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
|
|
|
|
The National Post | Yes | Read and deleted | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
|
|
|
|
Toronto Sun | Yes | Deleted without reading | Confirmed via electronic confirmation receipt. |
|
|
|
|
Vic Toews (Minister of Public Safety) | Yes | No response | Hard copy dispatched
registered post and signed
for by mail processing clerk, Mr M Dery. After at least half a dozen attempts by email to confirm the Minister's receipt, including by telephone, Cheri Elliott, the Minister's personal Executive Assistant, finally prepared to bring the letter to the Minister's attention by forwarding it personally to him with the message body of "FYI", unintentionally addressed it to myself. Three minutes later, having realized his mistake, he then attempted unsuccessfully to recall the email. As a consequence, the Minister's potential justification of future plausible deniability, with respect to personally having been made aware of the document, has now been destroyed. |
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, (C) Kip Warner.If you violate the terms of these copyright conditions without prior explicit writtenauthorization from me, you agree to indemnify me for all court costs, lawyer fees, and disbursementsin relation to the enforcement of these copyright conditions in any forum of law of my choosing. You furtheragree to a liquidated sum in the amount of $1M CAD payable to me in the event of a breach.You further agree to waive any statutory or common law SLAPP defence.